Show simple item record

Variabilidad de la precipitacion afecta la composición química, producción de gas y degradabilidad de los cactus

dc.contributor.authorRibeiro Menezes, Danielspa
dc.contributor.authorMuniz dos Santos, Julianaspa
dc.contributor.authorNunes de Oliveira, Cintia Raquelspa
dc.contributor.authorRodrigues Marcelino, Polyana Deysespa
dc.contributor.authorda Mata Araújo Pinheiro, Anna Paulaspa
dc.contributor.authorQueiroz de Carvalho, Dalinne Tamaraspa
dc.contributor.authorSilva Nascimento, Júlio Cesarspa
dc.contributor.authorGois, Glaycianespa
dc.contributor.authorVinhas Voltolini, Tadeuspa
dc.contributor.authorÁvila Queiroz, Mário Adrianospa
dc.date.accessioned2022-05-14 06:14:52
dc.date.accessioned2022-07-01T17:16:22Z
dc.date.available2022-05-14 06:14:52
dc.date.available2022-07-01T17:16:22Z
dc.date.issued2022-05-14
dc.identifier.urihttps://repositorio.unisucre.edu.co/handle/001/1650
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdfeng
dc.format.mimetypeaudio/mpegeng
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/epub+zipeng
dc.language.isoengeng
dc.publisherUniversidad de Sucrespa
dc.rightsDaniel Ribeiro Menezes, Juliana Muniz dos Santos, Cintia Raquel Nunes de Oliveira, Polyana Deyse Rodrigues Marcelino, Anna Paula da Mata Araújo Pinheiro, Dalinne Tamara Queiroz de Carvalho, Júlio Cesar Silva Nascimento, Glayciane Gois, Tadeu Vinhas Voltolini, Mário Adriano Ávila Queiroz - 2022eng
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0eng
dc.sourcehttps://revistas.unisucre.edu.co/index.php/recia/article/view/895eng
dc.subjectCactaceaeeng
dc.subjectcrassulacean acid metabolismeng
dc.subjectdrylandeng
dc.subjectdry mattereng
dc.subjectfood shortageeng
dc.subjectneutral detergent fibereng
dc.subjectCactaceaespa
dc.subjectescasez de alimentosspa
dc.subjectfibra detergente neutraspa
dc.subjectmateria secaspa
dc.subjectmetabolismo del ácido crasuláceospa
dc.subjectregiones de tierras secasspa
dc.titleVariabilidad de la precipitacion afecta la composición química, producción de gas y degradabilidad de los cactusspa
dc.typeArtículo de revistaspa
dc.typeJournal articleeng
dc.rights.accessrightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesseng
dc.type.driverinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleeng
dc.type.versioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioneng
dc.type.coarhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501eng
dc.type.coarhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501eng
dc.identifier.doi10.24188/recia.v14.n1.2022.895
dc.relation.referencesSalimon C, Anderson L. How strong is the relationship between rainfall variability and Caatinga productivity? A case study under a changing climate. An Acad Bras Ci. 2019; 90:2121–2127. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/0001-3765201720170143.eng
dc.relation.referencesMagalhães ALR, Teodoro AL, Gois GC, Campos FS, Souza JSR, Andrade AP, et al. Chemical and mineral composition, kinetics of degradation and in vitro gas production of native cactus. J Agric Stud. 2019; 7:119–137. https://doi.org/10.5296/jas.v7i4.eng
dc.relation.referencesEdvan RL, Mota RRM, Dias-Silva TP, Nascimento RR, Sousa SV, Silva AL, et al. Resilience of cactus pear genotypes in a tropical semi-arid region subject to climatic cultivation restriction. Scient Rep. 2020; 10:1–10. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-66972-0.eng
dc.relation.referencesCarvalho CBM, Edvan RL, Carvalho MLAM, Reis ALA, Nascimento RR. Uso de cactáceas na alimentação animal e seu armazenamento após colheita. Arch Zootec. 2018; 67:440-446. https://doi.org/10.21071/az.v67i259.3803.eng
dc.relation.referencesBarbosa HA, Kumar TVL, Paredes F, Elliott S, Ayuga JG. Assessment of Caatinga response to drought using Meteosat-SEVIRI normalized difference vegetation index (2008–2016). ISPRS J Phot Rem Sen. 2019; 148:235-252. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2018.12.014.eng
dc.relation.referencesSantos HG, Jacomine PKT, Anjos LHC, et al. Sistema brasileiro de classificação de solos. 5th ed. Brasília, DF: Embrapa; 2018.eng
dc.relation.referencesAoac. Association of Official Analytical Chemists. Official methods of analysis. 20th ed. Washington, DC: Latimer Jr., G.W; 2016.eng
dc.relation.referencesVan Soest PJ, Robertson JB, Lewis BA. Methods for dietary fiber, neutral detergent fiber, and non-starch polysaccharides in relation to animal nutrition. J Dairy Sci. 1991; 74:3583–3597. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(91)78551-2.eng
dc.relation.referencesMenezes DR, Costa RG, Araújo GGL, Pereira LGR, Nunes ACB, Henrique LT, et al. Cinética ruminal de dietas contendo farelo de mamona destoxificado. Arq Bras Med Vet Zootec. 2015; 67:636-641. https://doi.org/10.1590/1678-7040.eng
dc.relation.referencesSchofield P, Pitt RE, Pell AN. Kinetics of fiber digestion from in vitro gas production. J Anim Sci. 1994; 72:2980–2991. http://dx.doi.org/10.2527/1994.72112980x.eng
dc.relation.referencesTilley JMA, Terry RA. A two-stage technique for the in vitro digestion of forage crops. J Brit Grass Soc. 1963; 18:104–111. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2494.1963.tb00335.x.eng
dc.relation.referencesØrskov ER, Mcdonald I. The estimation of protein degradability in the rumen from incubation measurements weighted according to rate of passage. J Agric Sci. 1979; 92:499-503. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0021859600063048.eng
dc.relation.referencesAlves FAL, Andrade AP, Bruno RLA, Silva MGV, Souza MFV, Santos DC. Seasonal variability of phenolic compounds and antioxidant activity in prickly pear cladodes of Opuntia and Nopalea genes. Food Sci Techn. 2017; 37:536-543. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1678-457X.19316.eng
dc.relation.references14 Davis SC, Simpson J, Gil-Veja KC, Niechayev NA, van Tongerlo E, Castano NH, et al. Undervalued potential of crassulacean acid metabolism for current and future agricultural production. J Exp Bot. 2019; 70:6521–6537. https://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/erz223.eng
dc.relation.referencesMatias AGS, Araújo GGL, Campos FS, Moraes SA, Gois, GC, Silva TS, et al. Fermentation profile and nutritional quality of silages composed of cactus pear and maniçoba for goat feeding. J Agric Sci. 2020; 158:304-312. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0021859620000581.eng
dc.relation.referencesGouws CA, Georgousopoulou EN, Mellor DD, McKune A, Naumovski N. Effects of the consumption of prickly pear cacti (Opuntia spp.) and its products on blood glucose levels and insulin: A systematic review. Med. 2019; 55:1-18. https://dx.doi.org/10.3390/medicina55050138.eng
dc.relation.referencesPereira DS, Lana RP, Carmo DL, Costa YKS. Chemical composition and fermentative losses of mixed sugarcane and pigeon pea silage. Acta Scient. Anim Sci. 2019; 41:e43709. https://dx.doi.org/10.4025/actascianimsci.v41i1.43709.eng
dc.relation.referencesHristov AN, Bannink A, Crompton LA, Huhtanen P, Kreuzer M, McGee M, et al. Invited review: Nitrogen in ruminant nutrition: A review of measurement techniques. J Dairy Sci. 2019; 102:5811–5852. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2018-15829.eng
dc.relation.referencesAlbuquerque AS, Freire FJ, Barbosa MD, Marangon LC, Feliciano ALP. Efficiency of biological utilization of micronutrients by forests species in hypoxerophytic Caatinga. Flor Amb. 2018; 25:e20170925. https://doi.org/10.1590/2179-8087.092517.eng
dc.relation.referencesCarvalho CBM, Edvan RL, Nascimento KS, Nascimento RR, Bezerra LR, Jácome DLS, et al. Methods of storing cactus pear genotypes for animal feeding Afr J Range For Sci. 2020; 37:173-179. https://doi.org/10.2989/10220119.2020.1734084.eng
dc.relation.referencesFurtado RN, Carneiro MSS, Pereira ES, Moreira Filho EC, Magalhães JA, Oliveira SMP. Intake, milk yield, and physiological parameters of lactating cows fed on diets containing different quantities of xique xique (Pilosocereus gounellei). Semina: Ci Agr. 2016; 37:483-494. https://doi.org/10.5433/1679-0359.2016v37n1p483.eng
dc.relation.referencesCordova-Torres AV, Mendoza-Mendoza JC, Bernal-Santos G, Gasca TG, Kawas J, Costa RG, et al. Nutritional composition, in vitro degradability and gas production of Opuntia ficus indica and four other wild cacti species. Life Sci J. 2015; 12:42–54. https://doi.org/10.7537/marslsj1202s15.07.eng
dc.relation.referencesVazquez-Mendoza P, Miranda-Romero LA, Aranda-Osorio G, Burgueno-Ferreira JA, Salem AZM. Evaluation of eleven Mexican cultivars of prickly pear cactus trees for possibly utilization as animal fed: In vitro gas production. Agrof Syst. 2017; 91:749–756. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10457-016-9947-6.eng
dc.relation.referencesRibeiro IA, Voltolini TV, Simões WL, Ferreira MAJF, Menezes DR, Gois GC. Morphological responses, fruit yield, nutritive value and in vitro gas production of forage watermelon genotypes on semi-arid condition. Biol Rhyt Res. 2019; 50:1–9. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09291016.2019.1629218.eng
dc.relation.referencesPinto CS, Magalhães ALR, Teodoro AL, Gois GC, Véras RML, Campos FS, et al. Potential alternative feed sources for ruminant feeding from the biodiesel production chain by-products. South Afr J Anim Sci. 2020; 50:69–77. http://dx.doi.org/10.4314/sajas.v50i1.8.eng
dc.relation.referencesSilva JGM, Silva DS, Pereira WE, Diniz MCNM, Silva GJAM, Medeiros MR. Características morfológicas e produção do xique-xique cultivado em diferentes densidades. Rev Cent. 2011; 2:08–17.eng
dc.relation.referencesPinho RMA, Santos EM, Oliveira JS, Carvalho GGP, Silva TC, Macêdo AJS, et al. Does the level of forage neutral detergent fiber affect the ruminal fermentation, digestibility and feeding behavior of goats fed cactus pear? Anim Sci J. 2018; 89:1424-1431. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/asj.13043.eng
dc.relation.referencesYansari AT. Ruminal kinetics of nutrients degradation, hydration, and functional specific gravity of three types of beet pulp. Iranian J Appl Anim Sci. 2017; 7:17-26. http://ijas.iaurasht.ac.ir/article_528790.htmleng
dc.relation.referencesAlves FAL, Andrade AP, Bruno RLA, Santos DC. Study of the variability, correlation and importance of chemical and nutritional characteristics in cactus pear (Opuntia and Nopalea). Afr J Agric Res. 2016; 11:2882-2892. https://doi.org/10.5897/AJAR2016.11025eng
dc.relation.referencesDoorenbos J, Martín-Tereso J, Dijkstra J, Van Laar H. Effect of different levels of rapidly degradable carbohydrates calculated by a simple rumen model on performance of lactating dairy cows. J Dairy Sci. 2017; 100:5422-5433. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2016-12278eng
dc.rights.creativecommonsEsta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución 4.0.eng
dc.identifier.eissn2027-4297
dc.identifier.urlhttps://doi.org/10.24188/recia.v14.n1.2022.895
dc.relation.bitstreamhttps://revistas.unisucre.edu.co/index.php/recia/article/download/895/975
dc.relation.bitstreamhttps://revistas.unisucre.edu.co/index.php/recia/article/download/895/976
dc.relation.bitstreamhttps://revistas.unisucre.edu.co/index.php/recia/article/download/895/977
dc.relation.citationeditionNúm. 1 , Año 2022 : RECIA 14(1):ENERO-JUNIO 2022spa
dc.relation.citationendpagee895
dc.relation.citationissue1spa
dc.relation.citationstartpagee895
dc.relation.citationvolume14spa
dc.relation.ispartofjournalRevista Colombiana de Ciencia Animal - RECIAspa
dc.title.translatedRainfall variability affects the chemical composition, gas production and degradability of cactieng
dc.type.contentTexteng
dc.type.redcolhttp://purl.org/redcol/resource_type/ARTREFeng
dc.type.coarversionhttp://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85eng
dc.rights.coarhttp://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2eng


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView
Rev Colombiana Cienc Anim. RECIA-895.pdf488.8Kbapplication/pdfView/Open

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Daniel Ribeiro Menezes, Juliana Muniz dos Santos, Cintia Raquel Nunes de Oliveira, Polyana Deyse Rodrigues Marcelino, Anna Paula da Mata Araújo Pinheiro, Dalinne Tamara Queiroz de Carvalho, Júlio Cesar Silva Nascimento, Glayciane Gois, Tadeu Vinhas Voltolini, Mário Adriano Ávila Queiroz - 2022
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Daniel Ribeiro Menezes, Juliana Muniz dos Santos, Cintia Raquel Nunes de Oliveira, Polyana Deyse Rodrigues Marcelino, Anna Paula da Mata Araújo Pinheiro, Dalinne Tamara Queiroz de Carvalho, Júlio Cesar Silva Nascimento, Glayciane Gois, Tadeu Vinhas Voltolini, Mário Adriano Ávila Queiroz - 2022